untitled
<OAI-PMH schemaLocation=http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd>
<responseDate>2018-01-15T18:21:11Z</responseDate>
<request identifier=oai:HAL:hal-00429396v1 verb=GetRecord metadataPrefix=oai_dc>http://api.archives-ouvertes.fr/oai/hal/</request>
<GetRecord>
<record>
<header>
<identifier>oai:HAL:hal-00429396v1</identifier>
<datestamp>2018-01-11</datestamp>
<setSpec>type:ART</setSpec>
<setSpec>subject:sdu</setSpec>
<setSpec>subject:phys</setSpec>
<setSpec>subject:sde</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:LGSR</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:CNRS</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:UNIV-AG</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:UNIV-PARIS7</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:SDE</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:GM</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:UPMC</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:AGROPOLIS</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:GIP-BE</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:INSU</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:IPGP</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:USPC</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:B3ESTE</setSpec>
<setSpec>collection:UNIV-MONTPELLIER</setSpec>
</header>
<metadata><dc>
<publisher>HAL CCSD</publisher>
<title lang=en>Identifying global seismic anisotropy patterns by correlating shear-wave splitting and surface-wave data</title>
<creator>Wuestefeld, Andreas</creator>
<creator>Bokelmann, Goetz</creator>
<creator>Barruol, Guilhem</creator>
<creator>Montagner, Jean-Paul</creator>
<contributor>Géosciences Montpellier ; Université des Antilles et de la Guyane (UAG) - Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS) - Université de Montpellier (UM) - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)</contributor>
<contributor>Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) ; Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC) - Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS) - IPG PARIS - Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7) - Université de la Réunion (UR) - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)</contributor>
<description>International audience</description>
<source>ISSN: 0031-9201</source>
<source>EISSN: 0031-9201</source>
<source>Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors</source>
<publisher>Elsevier</publisher>
<identifier>hal-00429396</identifier>
<identifier>https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00429396</identifier>
<identifier>https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00429396/document</identifier>
<identifier>https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00429396/file/Wuestefeld_SKS_SW_correlation_PEPI2009-hal.pdf</identifier>
<source>https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00429396</source>
<source>Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, Elsevier, 2009, 176 (3-4), pp.198-212. 〈10.1016/j.pepi.2009.05.006〉</source>
<identifier>DOI : 10.1016/j.pepi.2009.05.006</identifier>
<relation>info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.pepi.2009.05.006</relation>
<language>en</language>
<subject lang=en>Anisotropy</subject>
<subject lang=en>Surface waves</subject>
<subject lang=en>Splitting</subject>
<subject lang=en>Upper mantle</subject>
<subject>[SDU.STU.GP] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph]</subject>
<subject>[PHYS.PHYS.PHYS-GEO-PH] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]/Geophysics [physics.geo-ph]</subject>
<subject>[SDE.MCG] Environmental Sciences/Global Changes</subject>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<type>Journal articles</type>
<description lang=en>We compare a global compilation of shear-wave splitting measurements with azimuthal seismic anisotropy parameters inferred from surface-wave tomography. The currently available splitting dataset is taken from a novel comprehensive collection of available publications that is updated interactively online. The comparison between the two types of data is made by calculating predicted splitting parameters from the anisotropic tomography model. Comparing these predicted splitting parameters with the observed ones, we find a considerable correlation between the two datasets at global scale. This result is noteworthy, since such correlation did not seem to exist in previous studies. The spatial resolution associated with the two types of methods is rather different. While surface waves have good vertical resolution and poor lateral resolution of several hundreds of kilometers, SKS splitting measurements have good lateral, but poor vertical resolution. The correlation can be understood in light of recent propositions that anisotropy seen by SKS splitting constrains mostly the upper mantle, and therefore a similar depth region as surface waves. The correlation also confirms the generally good quality of the shear-wave measurements, as well as that of the anisotropic tomography model.</description>
<date>2009</date>
</dc>
</metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
